Experienced Personal Training, Evidenced Based Nutrition and Intelligent Conversation!Posts RSS Comments RSS

Archive for May 25th, 2013

Finished Reading: The Righteous Mind

Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion

Book Description:

Release date: February 12, 2013 | Series: Vintage

As America descends deeper into polarization and paralysis, social psychologist Jonathan Haidt has done the seemingly impossible—challenged conventional thinking about morality, politics, and religion in a way that speaks to everyone on the political spectrum. Drawing on his twenty five years of groundbreaking research on moral psychology, he shows how moral judgments arise not from reason but from gut feelings. He shows why liberals, conservatives, and libertarians have such different intuitions about right and wrong, and he shows why each side is actually right about many of its central concerns. In this subtle yet accessible book, Haidt gives you the key to understanding the miracle of human cooperation, as well as the curse of our eternal divisions and conflicts. If you’re ready to trade in anger for understanding, read The Righteous Mind.

http://www.amazon.com/The-Righteous-Mind-Politics-Religion/dp/0307455777/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1369542809&sr=8-1&keywords=the+righteous+mind

Comments Off on Finished Reading: The Righteous Mind

Brisk Walk as Good as a Run!

Maggie Fox, Senior Writer, NBC News April 4, 2013

Walking really is just as good for you as running – but only if you compare it in terms of calories burned and not merely on time spent, researchers reported on Thursday.

Studies have gone back and forth on the question for years – is a stroll as good as a run? Does a brisk walk strengthen your heart as much as a pounding jog?

Paul Williams of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in California and Paul Thompson of Hartford Hospital in Connecticut think they’ve answered the question, finally. They did it in the best way possible, by comparing tens of thousands of runners to tens of thousands of walkers.

The answer is what common sense would dictate – it’s how much a person exercises in terms of energy spent, not how long he or she spends exercising, that matters.

“It takes longer to walk a mile than to run a mile. But if you match them up on the energy expended, they are comparable,” Williams said in a telephone interview. “If you do the same amount of exercise – if you expend the same number of calories – you get the same benefit.”

They studied 33,060 runners taking part in the National Runners’ Health Study and 15,045 walkers in the National Walkers’ Health Study. They measured their blood pressure, blood sugar and cholesterol at the beginning, and then watched for six years to see who got diagnosed with high blood pressure, unhealthy cholesterol or diabetes.

People who exercised equally in terms of energy output got the same benefit, regardless of whether they ran or walked, Williams and Thompson report in the American Heart Association journal Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis and Vascular Biology.

Williams said it made sense to study dedicated walkers and runners, because they usually keep careful track of distance and time spent running or walking. Most other people have trouble accurately estimating how much time and effort they spend exercising, he says.

They used a measurement called a MET. “One MET is how much energy you expend when you are sitting,” Williams said. Walking at a brisk pace burns 3.8 METS, or 3.8 times as much energy spent sitting for the same time. Running burns anywhere between 7 and 12 METS.

One MET of walking is roughly equivalent to a kilometer, or just over half a mile, Williams estimates. But running is less efficient than walking, so runners do tend to burn more calories over the same time.

“A person would need to walk 4.3 miles at a brisk pace to expend the same amount of exercise as running 3 miles, and it would take about twice as long (an hour and 15 minutes by walking instead of 38 minutes by running),” Williams says.

In general, the runners were younger and fitter than the walkers were. The male runners were 48 on average, versus 62 for the walkers; female runners were about 41 on average versus 53 for the walkers. The runners were 38 percent less likely to develop high blood pressure, 36 percent less likely to have high cholesterol and 71 percent less likely to develop diabetes than the walkers.

But this all seemed to be because the runners actually exercised more than the walkers did, Williams said.

“We have sort of known this all along,” said Dr. Gerald Fletcher, a cardiologist at the Mayo Clinic in Jacksonville, Fla., who was not involved in the study.

Running can burn more calories in a shorter time, so it’s good for people who are crunched for time. “But walking is certainly easier than running,” Fletcher said. “As long as people get out there and do it.”

The Institute of Medicine says Americans should try to get at least an hour of moderate exercise such as brisk walking every day to stay healthy. The Heart Association has similar guidelines.

Comments Off on Brisk Walk as Good as a Run!

People Think They’re Eating Less Than They Are!

By Maggie Fox, Senior Writer, NBC News

People may realize that fast food isn’t health food, but they don’t realize just how fattening it really is, researchers report.

They surveyed people eating at 10 burger, chicken, sandwich and doughnut chains and found they greatly underestimated just how much they were chowing down. The worst was Subway, which promotes itself as a healthier alternative, the researchers at Harvard Medical School found.

“At least two thirds of all participants underestimated the calorie content of their meals, with about a quarter underestimating the calorie content by at least 500 calories,” Harvard’s Jason Block and colleagues wrote in the British Medical Journal.

They interviewed more than 3,000 adults, children and teens visiting six different fast-food chains in Boston; Providence, Springfield, Mass. and Hartford, Ct., asking  them how much they ordered and how many calories they thought they were getting. The surveys were done in 2010 and 2011, before some regulations about calorie labeling came into effect.

People ate a lot. Checks of the receipts showed adults ate on average 836 calories in a meal, while teens and children ate more than 700.  But they estimated, on average that they were getting 175 calories less.

“The mean underestimation of calorie content was larger among Subway diners than those at other chains for adults,” Block’s team wrote.

The average U.S. adult needs about 2,000 calories a day, and kids need less. So people were getting more than a third of their day’s calories in a single fast-food visit. And studies show that eating just 100 calories in excess a day can add up to several pounds of extra fat over a year.

Many states and cities have passed tough calorie and fat-labeling laws. The 2010 health reform law will require major restaurant chains to provide clear calorie labels on menu boards.

Consumer advocates have complained for years that Americans don’t get the information they need to make healthy food choices. Not only are fatty, sugary foods everywhere, but it’s often hard to find out how many calories and how much fat  and sugar these foods pack.

Chain restaurants often list their nutritional information on websites or on menus kept behind the counter. What advocates want – and what governments are starting to require – is information listed right next to the food items on the menu board, so people are forced to see it when they order.

Block’s team looked at the biggets national chains: McDonald’s, Burger King, Wendy’s, KFC, Dunkin’ Donuts  and Subway. “We excluded pizza restaurant chains (such as Pizza Hut) because of the difficulty in determining the quantity that an individual bought for personal consumption,” they wrote.

About two-thirds of the adults taking part were overweight or obese – reflecting the actual U.S. population, the researchers found.  About a third of the teens were, while 57 percent of the school-age children were.

“Over 40 percent of participants in each sample ate at the chain restaurant where they were interviewed at least once a week,” the researchers wrote.

Fewer than one in five had even noticed any calorie information, and only 5 percent said they used that information to help them choose meals.

Subway advertises itself as a healthier option. “Branding could be an important component of Subway’s ‘health halo’,” the researchers said.

They believe the new labeling requirements will do a lot to help people understand how much food they really are getting in a fast-food restaurant. “Previous research has found that information can be most powerful when it contradicts previous expectations (in this case, improper estimation of calorie content of foods with a ‘health halo’),” they wrote.

Comments Off on People Think They’re Eating Less Than They Are!